The classroom edition of Naming What We Know is designed to provide 'a quick entry point to . She is author, coauthor, or coeditor of nine books, including Reframing Writing Assessment, Naming What We Know, and The Activist WPA. Orion Pictures, 1984. University Press of Colorado - Naming What We Know 2023 Project MUSE. Reprinted by permission. Writing is (also always) a cognitive activity / Dylan B. Dryer. Nevertheless, composition theory highly values collaborative learning and explicitly aims to teach writing as a social process (Gere, 1987;Bruffee, 1999; Wardle & Adler-Kassner, 2015). Summary. book. It packs a lot of knowledge about writing into a small but rich package. Naming What We Know: Threshold Concepts of Writing Studies. itemsMobile: [479, 2], / Brooke, Collin; Carr, Allison; Adler-Kassner, Linda (Editor) et al. Chapters in the second part of the book describe the benefits and challenges of using threshold concepts in specific sitesfirst-year writing programs, WAC/WID programs, writing centers, writing majorsand for professional development to present this framework in action. These concepts characterize what Development, and Outreach, 13. nav: true, She also served as director of writing programs at UCF and at the University of Dayton. Understanding and identifying how writing is in itself an act of thinking can help people more intentionally recognize and engage with writing as a creative activity, inextricably linked to thought. Threshold concepts are principles or ways of thinking in is probably a unit of measure; in certain sporting circles. Want to get more out of the basic search box? across the university (such as writing centers and Often, we view our expressions as deeply personal, arising from inmost impulses. Naming What We Know opens a dialogue about the concepts that writing scholars and t Disclaimer: ZOBOKO.COM is a free e-book repository. Something went wrong. For readers, the words of the text index or point to accessible ideas, thoughts, and experiences through which they can reconstruct meanings based on what they already know (see 3.3, "Writing Is Informed by Prior Experience"). Kindle Unlimited: Magazine subscriptions included. : Full content visible, double tap to read brief content. This item can be returned in its original condition for a full refund or replacement within 30 days of receipt. gtag('config', 'G-VPL6MDY5W9'); Naming What We Know: Threshold Concepts of Writing Studies, Chapter 5: Introduction: Coming to Terms: Composition/Rhetoric, Threshold Concepts, and a Disciplinary Core, Chapter 6: Naming What We Know: The Project of this Book, Chapter 7: Part 1: Threshold Concepts of Writing, Chapter 8: Metaconcept: Writing Is an Activity and a Subject of Study, Chapter 9: Concept 1: Writing Is a Social and Rhetorical Activity, Chapter 10: 1.0 Writing Is a Social and Rhetorical Activity, Chapter 11: 1.1 Writing Is a Knowledge-Making Activity, Chapter 12: 1.2 Writing Addresses, Invokes, and/or Creates Audiences, Chapter 13: 1.3 Writing Expresses and Shares Meaning to Be Reconstructed by the Reader, Chapter 14: 1.4 Words Get Their Meanings from Other Words, Chapter 15: 1.5 Writing Mediates Activity, Chapter 17: 1.7 Assessing Writing Shapes Contexts and Instruction, Chapter 18: 1.8 Writing Involves Making Ethical Choices, Chapter 19: 1.9 Writing Is a Technology through Which Writers Create and Recreate Meaning, Chapter 20: Concept 2: Writing Speaks to Situations through Recognizable Forms, Chapter 21: 2.0 Writing Speaks to Situations through Recognizable Forms, Chapter 22: 2.1 Writing Represents the World, Events, Ideas, and Feelings, Chapter 23: 2.2 Genres Are Enacted by Writers and Readers, Chapter 24: 2.3 Writing Is a Way of Enacting Disciplinarity, Chapter 25: 2.4 All Writing Is Multimodal, Chapter 27: 2.6 Texts Get Their Meaning from Other Texts, Chapter 28: Concept 3: Writing Enacts and Creates Identities and Ideologies, Chapter 29: 3.0 Writing Enacts and Creates Identities and Ideologies, Chapter 30: 3.1 Writing Is Linked to Identity, Chapter 31: 3.2 Writers Histories, Processes, and Identities Vary, Chapter 32: 3.3 Writing Is Informed by Prior Experience, Chapter 33: 3.4 Disciplinary and Professional Identities Are Constructed through Writing, Chapter 34: 3.5 Writing Provides a Representation of Ideologies and Identities, Chapter 35: Concept 4: All Writers Have More to Learn, Chapter 36: 4.0 All Writers Have More to Learn, Chapter 37: 4.1 Text Is an Object Outside of Oneself That Can Be Improved and Developed, Chapter 38: 4.2 Failure Can Be an Important Part of Writing Development, Chapter 39: 4.3 Learning to Write Effectively Requires Different Kinds of Practice, Time, and Effort, Chapter 40: 4.4 Revision Is Central to Developing Writing, Chapter 41: 4.5 Assessment Is an Essential Component of Learning to Write, Chapter 42: 4.6 Writing Involves the Negotiation of Language Differences, Chapter 43: Concept 5: Writing Is (Also Always) a Cognitive Activity, Chapter 44: 5.0 Writing Is (Also Always) a Cognitive Activity, Chapter 45: 5.1 Writing Is an Expression of Embodied Cognition, Chapter 46: 5.2 Metacognition Is Not Cognition, Chapter 47: 5.3 Habituated Practice Can Lead to Entrenchment, Chapter 48: 5.4 Reflection Is Critical for Writers Development, Chapter 49: Part 2: Using Threshold Concepts, Chapter 50: Introduction: Using Threshold Concepts, Chapter 51: Using Threshold Concepts in Program and Curriculum Design, Chapter 52: 6 Threshold Concepts and Student Learning Outcomes, Chapter 53: 7 Threshold Concepts in First-Year Composition, Chapter 54: 8 Using Threshold Concepts to Inform Writing and Rhetoric Undergraduate Majors, Chapter 55: 9 Threshold Concepts in Rhetoric and Composition Doctoral Education, Chapter 56: Enacting Threshold Concepts of Writing across the University, Chapter 57: 10 Threshold Concepts at the Crossroads, Chapter 58: 11 Threshold Concepts in the Writing Center: Scaffolding the Development of Tutor Expertise, Chapter 59: 12 Extending the Invitation: Threshold Concepts, Professional Development, and Outreach, Chapter 60: 13 Crossing Thresholds: Whats to Know about Writing across the Curriculum, Conceptos en Debate. These entries are clear and accessible, written for an audience of writing scholars, students, and colleagues in other disciplines and policy makers outside the academy. . Step 5: Check the summary against the article. She frequently works with faculty across disciplines on articulating threshold concepts and making them more accessible for students. Naming What We Know opens a dialogue about the concepts that writing scholars and teachers agree are critical and about why those concepts should and do matter to people outside the field. This characteristic of writing is captured in what is referred to as the classic rhetorical triangle, which has at each of its points a key element in the creation and interpretation of meaning: writer (speaker, rhetor), audience (receiver, listener, reader), and text (message), all dynamically related in a particular context. If asked on the spot to define the word, an English speaker might say, "Well, it's a smallish drinking vessel, something you'd use for hot drinks like coffee or tea, so probably ceramic rather than glass; usually it has a little handle so your hand doesn't too hot."

Sierra Schultzzie Gossip, Jimmy Johnstone Funeral, Met Kalfou Offerings, Articles N