[47] This PDF is on NARA's archives.gov. It directs the Secretary to either issue a final rule, or, if the Secretary determines that such an amendment does not meet the requirements and considerations of 49 U.S.C. on FederalRegister.gov 50. See www.regulations.gov for more information. 36. WebUnbelted vehicle occupants reach 0 mph by striking the windshield, steering column and dashboard. 12. include documents scheduled for later issues, at the request See, e.g., DOT 2009 Belt Warning Study, supra, pp. 89. Using a seat belt is one of the most effective actions a motor vehicle occupant can take to prevent death and injury in a crash. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Department of Transportation (DOT). The President of the United States manages the operations of the Executive branch of Government through Executive orders. The vehicle-based strategies included encouraging vehicle manufacturers to voluntarily install enhanced seat belt warning systems; providing consumer information on vehicles equipped with enhanced warning systems as part of NCAP; and continued monitoring and assessment of the effectiveness and acceptability of enhanced seat belt warnings through research. Motor vehicle safety is defined in the Motor Vehicle Safety Act as the performance of a motor vehicle or motor vehicle equipment in a way that protects the public against unreasonable risk of accidents occurring because of the design, construction, or performance of a motor vehicle, and against unreasonable risk of death or injury in an accident, and includes nonoperational safety of a motor vehicle.[52] The 2004 Transportation Research Board Report on technologies to increase seat belt use observed that, while limited, the data available to date provide strongly converging evidence in support of both the potential effectiveness and consumer acceptance of many new seat belt use technologies[. ECE Regulation No. To what extent should we expect increased effectiveness and benefits for a system utilizing occupant detection compared to a system without such technology? Charles J. Kahane. 16, Revision 9 8.4.2.4.1.1. to 8.4.2.4.1.3. NHTSA's consumer research shows that part-time non-users make up the majority of non-users (83%), while hard-core non-users make up a smaller proportion of non-users (17%). 0000006317 00000 n 30111, NHTSA seeks comment on whether it should consider any non-regulatory approaches to address this issue. shot of 80 proof whiskey, a 5 oz. However, when optimization was complete, the 30 and +30 and 25 mph 40% offset conditions were checked to ensure that all of the injury measures were Obstruction of vehicle windows. For example, NHTSA could specify use of the 6-year-old test dummy. To facilitate an effective warning that advances safety and is appropriate for diverse vehicle types and uses, NHTSA seeks comment on alternative cost-effective solutions that would alert the driver when a rear seat passenger buckles and/or unbuckles. As the vehicle continues to deform at the beginning, the passengers are still traveling forward at the speed of the vehicle. [78] PCMAG, 20 Nov. 2022 Across the state in 2021 the seat belt compliance rate was 93.5% but unbelted occupants still accounted for over half of those killed in traffic crashes, the release said. [66] Seat belt interlocks prevent starting or operating a motor vehicle if an occupant is not using a seat belt. 62. Drivers should not be influenced by friends or peer groups when driving and should make their own decisions in regard to driving habits. so we are aware there are a number of ways in which a rear seat belt warning system might be intentionally defeated, as well as potential countermeasures. [50] 0000047389 00000 n glass of wine and a 12 oz. Some research may suggest that having the warning visible to the unbelted occupant may increase effectiveness. 0000018071 00000 n [89] seat-belt Next, for the type(s) of occupants upon which the criteria are based, what should the criteria be? 1. documents in the last year, by the International Trade Commission Automatic belts are rarely, if ever, installed in current production vehicles, and NHTSA's regulations limit the seating positions for which automatic belts may be used to rear seats. This is a national telephone survey periodically conducted by NHTSA. In response, the agency conducted a multi-phase research study (described below). [77] 2007 Motor Vehicle Occupant Safety Survey, Volume 2, Seat Belt Report. If a visual warning system including a telltale were to be required, should NHTSA propose requirements for telltale characteristics, and if so, what should they be? 0000047687 00000 n One scenario is when the driver uses a remote engine starter so that the initial warning activates before the driver (and perhaps the rear seat occupants) are in the vehicle. 0000008408 00000 n The rele- B.) Seat belts reduce the risk of fatality for rear outboard occupants by 54 percent (passenger cars) and 75 percent (light trucks and vans), and for center occupants, by 58 percent (passenger cars) and 75 percent (light trucks and vans).[10]. You may Start Printed Page 51077send mail to these officials at: The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. 0000043729 00000 n [18] (MAP-21 also repeals a statutory provision that prohibited NHTSA from requiring or specifying as a compliance option an audible seat belt warning lasting longer than 8 seconds.) 0000043267 00000 n [54] With respect to audible warnings, we seek comment on the following: 17. See S571.3. 4. Visual warning location. Only 66 percent of people who said they always wore seat belts while driving also said they always wore them as rear seat passengers. Transportation Research Board Study, p. 9. (The results of this study, which involved a consumer phone survey and was completed in 2015, are discussed later in this document.). Mazda and Ford introduced rear seat belt reminders in MY 2018 and 2019, respectively. 0000009615 00000 n The NHTSA estimates that ___% of the 11,510 drivers with a BAC of .01 or higher who were involved in fatal crashes had BAC levels at or above .08. 2019-20644 Filed 9-26-19; 8:45 am], updated on 4:15 PM on Friday, April 28, 2023, updated on 8:45 AM on Friday, April 28, 2023, 126 documents For example, approximately 80 percent of drivers of vehicles with a rear seat belt warning were satisfied with the system and 65 percent of drivers of vehicles equipped with rear seat belt reminders reported that the rear seat belt reminder made it easier to encourage rear seat passengers to buckle up.[4]. [13] How many moles of magnesium were used in this reaction? (Below we also seek comment on alternative non-traditional approaches.) Should NHTSA propose one or more of these systems as requirements or compliance options? Is this an appropriate threshold? The study covered several states in different parts of the country. Euro NCAP provides consumer information on the safety of new cars. What is now the first option (S7.3(a)(1)) was added to S7.3 in 1991.[26]. headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents. NHTSA seeks comment on this issue, particularly on whether such electrical connection requirements should be proposed, and if so what they should be, and what types of seats they should be required for. documents in the last year, by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Paul Schroeder & Melanie Wilbur. 4092 0 obj <> endobj Unrestrained passenger vehicle occupant fatalities up 14% Motorcyclist fatalities up 11% (highest number since first data collection in 1975) Bicyclist fatalities up 9.2% (highest number since 1987) Passenger car occupant fatalities up 9% Fatalities in urban areas up 8.5% Pedestrian fatalities up 3.9% (highest number since 1989) 04/28/2023, 858 You should _______ your following distance as your visibility decreases as the weather gets worse. Although NHTSA did not previously have the authority to require, or specify as a compliance option, a seat belt warning with an audible signal lasting more than 8 seconds, the agency facilitated the voluntary adoption of enhanced warnings through a series of legal interpretations that determined that the Safety Act did not prohibit manufacturers from using enhanced warning systems (e.g., systems with audible warnings that lasted more than 8 seconds) as long as the manufacturer differentiated the voluntarily-provided signal from the required signal (for example, by a clearly distinguishable lapse in time between the two signals). 23. Electrical Connection Requirements. In addition to a warning at the beginning of a trip, should there be a warning if a seat belt becomes unbuckled in the course of a trip (a change-of-status warning)? (B) that has soil with poor drainage. L. 112-141) directs the Secretary[5] To what extent would requiring a warning be visible to rear passengers increase cost and complexity, and would this be justified?

Pfizer Senior Scientist Salary San Diego, Giant Leopard Plant Poisonous To Dogs, Yuja Wang Illness, Articles U